The Great Gatsby [2013]
Directed by: Baz Luhrmann
Written by: Baz Luhrmann and Craig Pearce; based on the novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Carey Mulligan, Tobey Maguire, Joel Edgerton, Elizabeth Debicki, Amitabh Bachchan, Jason Clarke, Isla Fisher, Adelaide Clemens
Gatsby took his sweet time getting here. Luhrmann’s take on Fitzgerald’s lauded novel was my most anticipated film of 2012, sharing that honor with Les Misérables. Then it got pushed back, thus becoming my most anticipated movie of 2013. The music was leaked, track by track, making me curious as to how a 20’s party set to will.i.am. or Fergie would look and sound. I made it no secret that I was anxiously waiting for this movie, sharing every picture, song and clip I could find on social media and talking about it to anyone who would listen.
After every delay, I still had to wait about a month for it to reach Mexican screens. A long month of reading wildly diverging opinions by my blogging friends from other countries. So when I got to the office on Monday, after the Gatsby opening weekend, and a coworker asked me how was it (note that he didn’t ask if I had seen it. Of course I had. Twice.) I responded with a resounding “meh”.
“That’s all I needed to know”, he said.
It’s impossible to live up to the reputation of “the great American novel” and even harder living up to the perfect picture I’d formed inside my head, but The Great Gatsby could and should have been much better. The soundtrack seemed poised to be as crucial an element to the whole package as Gatsby himself, but it ended up being a mere afterthought.
The party scenes are certainly highlights of the film, but there are few and far in between. In the meantime, Carey Mulligan doesn’t do much to make Daisy a little more likeable, and the script does not help us understand why Gatsby is so obsessed with her. Leonardo DiCaprio is solid, as always, but this is not the role that will finally bring him that long-delayed Oscar. Elizabeth Debicki is trying too hard, while two people stand out. Never thought I’d be writing this, but the first is Tobey Maguire, perfectly cast as Gatsby’s geeky, unrefined neighbor and friend Nick Carraway. The other is Joel Edgerton, making the most out of a tiny but pivotal role.
Fitzgerald’s book is less than 200 pages long so it strikes me as odd that, at least the 1974 and 2013 versions, go on for over two hours. I don’t get the need to stretch out the already slight story. In this latest adaptation, the visuals are gorgeous but even those get a little tiring if nothing is going on. I know it doesn’t seem that way, but I actually liked this film. However, as a fan of the great talent involved, I can’t help but feel dissatisfied with it. Amid the razzle-dazzle and the pleasantly anachronistic soundtrack, there’s a sea of wasted potential.
Sorry to hear it disappointed you Fernando, but at least you got a good review out of it. I agree with you across the boards here. I’d have thought that the big parties and Luhrmann’s style would have gone hand in hand, but somehow he cant make the drama work 😦
LikeLike
Yeah, his work was hit and miss. He nailed all the visual aspects but the story lacked some punch.
LikeLike
Nice review Fernando. Didn’t care much for this movie either. It had all of the right ingredients to make it work and be amazing, but it just fell over on it’s feet and went nowhere. Love the poster though!
LikeLike
The drama was too tepid, and yes! Isn’t that poster awesome?
LikeLike
Where’d you get it from? Or, did you make that yourself?
LikeLike
I wish! No, I found it on Google.
LikeLike
I’m bummed for you that you didn’t like this one, i’ve had that happen & it’s no fun. I did enjoy the film but I agree about Maguire and particularly Edgerton, I don’t think there could have been a better Tom Buchanan.
LikeLike
I did enjoy it, but it just wasn’t as good as it needed to (and could) be, in my opinion. Maguire and Edgerton were great. I wouldn’t be surprised if the latter got an Oscar nom.
LikeLike
Great review, wasted potential indeed. It definitely isn’t bad, like you said, but I can’t help but feel a classic like this deserved a bit better. Totally agree on the length issue, it always bothers me when a movie goes over 2 hours when it really didn’t have to. Good review 🙂
LikeLike
Thanks, Andy! It could’ve been better if it was trimmed a bit, but yeah, it should’ve been a better movie, considering the stature of the source material.
LikeLike
I’m sorry you were disappointed, I knew how excited you were! I did like a lot of it, but it was still a bit wishy-washy in certain areas. Wait 15 years and we’ll get another one!
LikeLike
My most anticipated movies almost always disappoint me. It’s only natural. But yeah, I’m bummed this wasn’t better. Hope someone is able to do a great adaptation soon!
LikeLike
I actually really quite liked this but I have a tendency to get caught up in aesthetics and forget about the substance…
LikeLike
Sometimes I do that too, but in here I couldn’t help but feel underwhelmed. Yes, the visuals are superb, but I wanted more out of this film.
LikeLike
Great review Fernando! I’ve been curious about what you think of this but what you said in the closing statement is spot on “…there’s a sea of wasted potential” Indeed! I’m also impressed w/ Joel Edgerton!
LikeLike
Nice review mate. I’ve just started to read the book so I think I’m gonna wrap that up first before I see this, which probably means it’ll end up being a rental.
LikeLike
I hope you finish it in time to still catch it in theatres. The visuals are stunning. Either way, it’s not a bad movie, and you could do much worse.
LikeLike
Nice review Fernando!
LikeLike
Thanks, dude!
LikeLike
A style and no substance seems to be the consensus view with this one Fernando. I always change my mind on whether I should check it out or not. Think I’ll leave it for now. Nice write-up buddy.
LikeLike
Thanks, Mark! It’s got some good aspects, but if you skipped it, it wouldn’t be the worst thing.
LikeLike
For some reason, this review feels more like 2.5 or 3 stars than 3.5.
Still, I’m glad you enjoyed it, even if you were disappointed. You said you went and saw it twice!? Wow.
LikeLike
Yeah, I think I made it sound a bit too much on the negative side. It’s the disappointment talking!
Yeah. I wasn’t planning on seeing it twice, though. The second time I was supposed to watch Spring Breakers but my friends wanted to see Gatsby.
LikeLike
Hates it, you should have seen Spring Breakers that second time for sure.
LikeLike
Pingback: DVD Court: The Great Gatsby + Pain & Gain | Committed to Celluloid
Pingback: All around the Globes | Committed to Celluloid
Pingback: A few (late) musings on the 2014 Oscar nominees | Committed to Celluloid
Pingback: Lock ‘em in: final predictions before the Oscars! | Committed to Celluloid
Pingback: My Top 10 of 2013 (yes, in March) | Committed to Celluloid
Pingback: Apparently i’m a versatile blogger | Committed to Celluloid